HomeNeuroscienceAfter the strategies disaster, the speculation disaster – Thoughts Hacks

After the strategies disaster, the speculation disaster – Thoughts Hacks

This thread began by Ekaterina Damer has prompted many suggestions from psychologists on twitter.

Listed here are a lot of the suggestions, with their recommender in brackets. I haven’t learn these, however wished to collate them in a single place. Feedback are open when you have your individual solutions.

(Iris van Rooij)
“How does it work?” vs. “What are the legal guidelines?” Two conceptions of psychological clarification. Robert Cummins

(Ed Orehek)
Concept Development in Social Persona Psychology: Private Experiences and Classes Realized: A Particular Concern of Persona and Social Psychology Assessment

(Djouria Ghilani)
Private Reflections on Concept and Psychology
Gerd Gigerenzer,

Chosen Works of Barry N. Markovsky

(just about everybody, however Tal Yarkoni put it like this)
“Meehl mentioned most of what there may be to say about this”

  • Concept-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox
  • Appraising and amending theories: The technique of Lakatosian protection and two rules that warrant it
  • Why summaries of analysis on psychological theories are sometimes uninterpretable
  • (Which jogs my memory, PsychBrief has been studying Meehl and gives in depth summaries right here: Paul Meehl on philosophy of science: video lectures and papers)

    (Burak Tunca)
    What Concept is Not by Robert I. Sutton & Barry M. Staw

    (Joshua Skewes)
    Valerie Grey Hardcastle’s “The right way to construct a principle in cognitive science”.

    (Randy McCarthy)
    Chapter 1 of Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2015). Concept and clarification in social psychology. Guilford Publications.

    (Kimberly Quinn)
    McGuire, W. J. (1997). Artistic speculation producing in psychology: Some helpful heuristics. Annual overview of psychology, 48(1), 1-30.

    (Daniël Lakens)
    Jaccard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2010). Concept Development and Mannequin-building Abilities: A Sensible Information for Social Scientists. Guilford Press.

    Fiedler, Okay. (2004). Instruments, toys, truisms, and theories: Some ideas on the inventive cycle of principle formation. Persona and Social Psychology Assessment, 8(2), 123–131.

    (Tom Stafford)
    Roberts and Pashler (2000). How persuasive is an efficient match? A touch upon principle testing

    From the dialogue it’s clear that the speculation disaster shall be each bit as wealthy and filled with dissent because the strategies disaster.

    Updates 16 August 2018

    (Richard Prather)
    Simmering et al (2010). To Mannequin or To not Mannequin? A Dialogue on the Function of Computational Modeling in Developmental Science

    (Brett Buttliere: we made a Fb group to speak about principle)
    Psychological Concept Dialogue Group

    (Eric Morris)
    Wilson, Okay. G. (2001). Some notes on theoretical constructs: sorts and validation from a contextual behavioral perspective

    (Michael P. Grosz)
    Theoretical Amnesia by Denny Borsboom

    (Ivan Grahek)
    Fiedler (2017). What Constitutes Robust Psychological Science? The (Uncared for) Function of Diagnosticity and A Priori Theorizing

    (Iris van Rooij)
    Extra solutions in these two theads (one, two)



    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Most Popular

    Recent Comments